Top 11 Influencer Marketing Agencies

Last Updated: August 10th · 11 Agencies ranked

Steph Payas
Written by Steph Payas
Chief Marketing Officer
Brian Sorel
Reviewed by Brian Sorel
Chief Operating Officer
About

You have been told to come back with three names. The problem is that every agency here can show a campaign that worked, and most of them cannot show what it was worth. Reach, impressions and engagement appear on nearly every case. A sale, a signup or a return measured against a stated denominator appears on a handful. So the shortlisting question is not who has done big work. It is who will report on the thing your finance director asks about.

Read the full methodology

Overview
#AgencySpecialityScoreLocation (HQ)
2 Ogilvy New York Brand-scale creative 84 /100 New YorkNY
3 Edelman New York Earned-media campaigns 83 /100 New YorkNY
4 Dentsu Creative London Integrated brand campaigns 73 /100 LondonUnited Kingdom
5 YKONE Paris Luxury, destination reach 70 /100 ParisFrance
6 Billion Dollar Boy London Social-first creative 69 /100 LondonUnited Kingdom
7 Open Influence Los Angeles Film and TV launches 69 /100 Los AngelesCA
8 Buttermilk London 66 /100 LondonUK
9 We Are Social London Socially led creative 66 /100 LondonUnited Kingdom
10 Socially Powerful London Always-on programmes 61 /100 LondonUK
11 Viral Nation Toronto Enterprise social programmes 61 /100 TorontoON
Ogilvy logo

Ogilvy

84 /100
New York, NY Global network agency, WPP

Ogilvy is a WPP network agency founded in 1948, and it takes the top score on this page. It takes it on breadth: an awards record and a client list that reach across every category an advertiser can buy in, backed by the scale to run several markets at once. Its 24 on creative quality is the joint highest here.

The published record is thinner than the score implies. Of 77 cases on its site, 20 carry a figure. The ones that do are strong. Dove's #TurnYourBack reports 54m video views, 567K+ engagements and 174 pieces of press coverage. CeraVe's Super Bowl work reports a 25% sales increase and 32B earned impressions. Vaseline Originals reports a 466% launch sales uplift and two sold-out drops. Most of the rest is published as a story with no number in it at all.

So the score and the evidence point in different directions. Ogilvy is built for a brief where the idea is the risk and the budget is large enough to make the idea happen. If your shortlist is judged on what a campaign returned, you will be reading fewer than a third of its cases, and none of them names a creator fee. Expect the account team to be senior, expensive, and shared with much bigger clients than you.

Score breakdown
Creative Quality 24/25
Client Impact 24/25
Industry Recognition 16/25
Revenue & Growth 20/25

Services Ogilvy offer

  • Ambassador Program Management
  • B2B Influencer Programs
  • Community Management
  • Compliance & Disclosure Management
  • Content Repurposing & Editing
  • Crisis & Reputation Management
Edelman logo

Edelman

83 /100
New York, NY 6,000-plus people, 28 countries

Edelman is a communications firm founded in 1952, and earned media is what it sells. It takes 25 of 25 on client impact, the highest available, because it publishes a result on nearly everything it shows and that work spans more categories than anyone else here.

The figures are press and reach figures. ASICS Eternal Run reports 1.7B earned reach and 81% purchase intent. Dove's Code my Crown reports 1.8B impressions and a 32% brand loyalty increase. Heineken's The Social Swap reports 122K engagements against 226M paid social impressions, and it separates the two. Go MonGolia is the outlier that names money: $1.2B in tourism revenue and 650K tourists.

What you rarely get is a sales number. Impressions, sentiment and stated intent do most of the work in this set, and intent is not purchase. Edelman is also a firm where a creator programme usually sits inside a wider communications retainer, so a brand that wants ten creators and a report, rather than a strategy engagement, is buying the wrong shape. Ask what the smallest piece of work they will take on actually is.

Score breakdown
Creative Quality 22/25
Client Impact 25/25
Industry Recognition 16/25
Revenue & Growth 20/25

Services Edelman offer

  • Ambassador Program Management
  • B2B Influencer Programs
  • Community Management
  • Competitor Influencer Audits
  • Compliance & Disclosure Management
  • Content Repurposing & Editing

Dentsu Creative

73 /100
London, United Kingdom Global creative network, dentsu

Dentsu Creative is the creative arm of the dentsu network, run out of London. It publishes 30 cases and every one of them reports a result, which is rarer on this page than it sounds. The work also runs wider than creator marketing: loyalty programmes, pharma targeting, retail media and brand films sit next to the social campaigns.

Nutter Butter reports 3.3B earned impressions and 1.1M new followers off a run of deliberately strange TikToks. Crayola's Campaign For Creativity reports 4.1M TikTok impressions and $186K in earned media value. Foot Locker's The Hunt for Court People reports 169M impressions and a product that sold out in under two hours. Intel's Project Athena reports 370M impressions, and it says plainly that they are paid media.

The score hides one weakness. Revenue and growth is 9 out of 25, the lowest of the top three, because the entity that publishes this work is younger and smaller than the network standing behind it. And a lot of what Dentsu Creative shows is not creator work at all. If you brief them on a creator programme, ask which of the named cases their influencer team actually ran, and who staffs yours.

Score breakdown
Creative Quality 24/25
Client Impact 24/25
Industry Recognition 16/25
Revenue & Growth 9/25

Services Dentsu Creative offer

  • Affiliate & Performance-Based Programs
  • B2B Influencer Programs
  • Community Management
  • Competitor Influencer Audits
  • Content Repurposing & Editing
  • Crisis & Reputation Management
YKONE logo

YKONE

70 /100
Paris, France 201-500 people, luxury and travel

YKONE is a Paris agency working almost entirely in luxury, beauty and destination marketing. It publishes 54 cases, 52 of them with numbers, and it takes 25 of 25 on client impact for that volume and spread. The client list is the point: BOSS, Balenciaga, Guerlain, Piaget, Swarovski, Puma, MINI and several tourism boards.

The reporting is consistent, and it is nearly always audience. BOSS's 2025 activations report 62.6M reach and 115.6M impressions. Experience Abu Dhabi's Formula One work reports 88M reach and 625M impressions. A handful of cases go further and publish a return: MINI at 7.7x, MSC Cruises at 6.1x ROAS, reMarkable at 5.5x and Swarovski at 3.7x ROAS. None of them says what sat in the denominator.

Recognition is where it falls down, at 4 out of 25, which for an agency this size means the awards and the tier-one press are not there. The bigger issue for a general shortlist is fit. Nearly everything YKONE publishes is aspirational category work, and the reporting is built around reach, impressions and earned media value rather than sales. If you sell a mid-priced product through a retailer, this is not the reference set you want.

Score breakdown
Creative Quality 21/25
Client Impact 25/25
Industry Recognition 4/25
Revenue & Growth 20/25

Services YKONE offer

  • Affiliate & Performance-Based Programs
  • Ambassador Program Management
  • B2B Influencer Programs
  • Co-Creation & Product Collaboration
  • Community Management
  • Competitor Influencer Audits

Billion Dollar Boy

69 /100
London, United Kingdom 201-500 people, London and New York

Billion Dollar Boy is a London creator agency working mostly in beauty, drinks, fashion and retail. It publishes 37 cases and every one of them carries a figure, which is why client impact lands at 25 of 25. Zalando, Garnier, Heineken, PepsiCo, Primark, Loewe and L'Oréal Paris are all on the record.

Some of it is genuinely commercial. Lipton Ice Tea's Pass the Sunshine reports a 15% sales increase against 40M impressions and a £1.93 CPM. Walkers reports an 11.2% ad recall lift and 125M impressions. Vichy reports a 99% sell-out on Mineral 89. Elsewhere the headline is softer than it looks: the Ray-Ban Stories case leads on 29M potential reach against 1.8M impressions actually delivered.

Recognition is 5 out of 25 and the category spread is narrow. Almost nothing here is technology, finance, healthcare or anything sold to a business, so if that is your product you are asking them to work outside their published record. The other thing to settle early is what a reach number means in their reporting. On the Ray-Ban case, potential reach and delivered impressions differ by an order of magnitude, and both sit under the same heading.

Score breakdown
Creative Quality 22/25
Client Impact 25/25
Industry Recognition 5/25
Revenue & Growth 17/25

Services Billion Dollar Boy offer

  • Affiliate & Performance-Based Programs
  • Ambassador Program Management
  • B2B Influencer Programs
  • Community Management
  • Competitor Influencer Audits
  • Content Repurposing & Editing
Open Influence logo

Open Influence

69 /100
Los Angeles, CA 51-200 people, entertainment-led

Open Influence is a Los Angeles agency with 26 published cases, 25 of them carrying figures. Its reporting habit is unusual and useful: it publishes what it promised alongside what it delivered, so you can see the size of the beat rather than only the size of the number.

The Disney Pixar Lightyear campaign reports impressions at 709% of goal and engagement rate at 149% of goal. Visit Philadelphia reports 627% of its impressions goal and 440% of engagements. Mercedes-Benz reports reel view rate at 132% of benchmark and 95.4% positive comment sentiment. Subaru, adidas Originals, Uber and Moderna all appear with view and engagement totals attached.

Beating a goal is not the same as moving a business, and that is the honest limit here. A 627% delivery against an impressions target says the target was low as easily as it says the campaign was big. Almost none of these cases report a sale, a signup or a return. Open Influence also concentrates in automotive, entertainment and travel, so a beauty or a food brand is buying transferable process rather than a matching precedent.

Score breakdown
Creative Quality 17/25
Client Impact 24/25
Industry Recognition 11/25
Revenue & Growth 17/25

Services Open Influence offer

  • Ambassador Program Management
  • B2B Influencer Programs
  • Competitor Influencer Audits
  • Event & Experiential Activations
  • Influencer Campaign Management
  • Influencer Campaign Strategy
Buttermilk logo

Buttermilk

66 /100
London, UK Beauty and fashion specialist

Buttermilk is a London agency founded in 2016, working in beauty, fashion and wellness. It publishes 13 cases, all with figures, and the client list is the reason it is here: Prada Beauty, Armani Beauty, Estée Lauder, Marc Jacobs, Mugler, Nike, Gap and Elizabeth Arden.

The reporting is written against targets. Prada Beauty's US launch reports views at 684% over KPI, engagement at 141% over, and a number one Sephora ranking in two categories. Mugler reports views 262% over KPI. Gap reports 6% year-on-year sales growth and a 198% rise in brand mentions. Nike's Chase the High reports 13M impressions, 7.5% engagement and a 450% spike in product search.

Two things to weigh. The published results are mostly measured against the brief rather than against the business, so a 684% overdelivery tells you the plan was beaten, not what beating it was worth. And this is a small agency in a narrow lane. Outside beauty, fashion and wellness there is almost nothing to check, and a campaign that needs simultaneous launches across a dozen markets is a stretch for a team this size.

Score breakdown
Creative Quality 20/25
Client Impact 22/25
Industry Recognition 11/25
Revenue & Growth 13/25

Services Buttermilk offer

  • Ambassador Program Management
  • B2B Influencer Programs
  • Campaign Management / Execution
  • Co-Creation & Product Collaboration
  • Community Management
  • Competitor Influencer Audits

We Are Social

66 /100
London, United Kingdom

We Are Social is a global social agency run out of London, and the most decorated independent on this page. It scores 23 of 25 on creative quality, the highest here outside the two network agencies, and the work is genuinely inventive: hashtag mechanics, in-game formats, stunts built for a platform rather than adapted to one.

#PlayWithPringles reports 4.7B views and 2M videos created. adidas's Super Bowl piece reports 97M Instagram views. Pepsi's Champions League opening ceremony reports 250M video views. Barilla's The Rooftop Match reports 3.6B reach across 240 outlets. The numbers are enormous and hardly any of them are business numbers.

That is the trade. Client impact scores 12 of 25, the lowest of anyone on this list, because a large share of what We Are Social publishes is a story with an audience figure and nothing underneath it. Lavazza reports a 4.1% purchase intent increase and McCain a 9% purchase rise among younger buyers, and those two stand out precisely because they are rare. If your brief is awareness, this is a strong shortlist entry. If it is conversion, ask for the cases that are not on the site.

Score breakdown
Creative Quality 23/25
Client Impact 12/25
Industry Recognition 11/25
Revenue & Growth 20/25
Socially Powerful logo

Socially Powerful

61 /100
London, UK Global network, local market teams

Socially Powerful is a London agency built around short-form video. It publishes 16 cases, all with figures, most of them TikTok, and the client list runs from Ulta Beauty and L'Oréal to Lenovo Legion, PUBG Mobile and TikTok itself.

The reporting includes clicks, which is rarer here than it should be. The Gym Group campaign reports 15M views and 1M clicks. Xiaomi reports 20M views and 250K clicks. PUBG's anniversary reports 12M reach and 120K+ clicks. The Body Shop's Middle East work reports 17M reach, 30M impressions and a 15% uplift in sales, which is one of the few sales figures anywhere on this page.

Industry recognition scores nothing at all: no awards, no tier-one press in the window, nobody outside the agency vouching for the work. So everything you believe about it, you are believing from its own site. The work is also concentrated in beauty, gaming and consumer technology. A financial services or healthcare brand will find the process plausible and the precedent missing.

Score breakdown
Creative Quality 20/25
Client Impact 23/25
Industry Recognition 0/25
Revenue & Growth 18/25

Services Socially Powerful offer

  • Affiliate & Performance-Based Programs
  • B2B Influencer Programs
  • Community Management
  • Competitor Influencer Audits
  • Compliance & Disclosure Management
  • Content Repurposing & Editing
Viral Nation logo

Viral Nation

61 /100
Toronto, ON Enterprise, social commerce

Viral Nation is a Toronto agency that grew out of gaming and creator management. It publishes nine cases, fewer than anyone else here, but they are unusually specific about what happened.

The e.l.f. Cosmetics campaign, where a creator ran the company for a day, reports 18.9M views in 24 hours, $857K in earned media value, 50K units sold in ten hours and the number one TikTok Shop ranking in the US. The Call of Duty League work reports 96M impressions and subscriber growth of 32% year on year. ViewSonic reports 10.1M impressions, 76K clicks and a 2.5% click-through rate.

Nine cases is a thin record for an agency this size, and the score describes a business much larger than what it chooses to publish. Recognition sits at 5 out of 25. The set also leans hard into gaming, esports and beauty commerce. If your category is not one of those, you are extrapolating from a very small sample, and you should ask to see work under NDA before you decide.

Score breakdown
Creative Quality 19/25
Client Impact 21/25
Industry Recognition 5/25
Revenue & Growth 16/25

Services Viral Nation offer

  • Ambassador Program Management
  • Community Management
  • Crisis & Reputation Management
  • Custom Technology & Platform Development
  • Event & Experiential Activations
  • Influencer Campaign Management

How to choose an influencer marketing agency

You have been asked for three names. These are the four checks that turn a long list into a short one, and none of them takes longer than a phone call.

Ask what the headline number counts

The biggest figures in this category are the least useful. Potential reach is who could have seen the content, not who did. Earned media value is a price the agency put on coverage nobody bought. A hashtag total counts everything ever posted under it, including the posts you had nothing to do with.

So take one campaign, one channel, one window, and ask for the result for that. Ask what was organic and what was paid. An agency with working reporting sends it back the same week, and that single request thins a long list faster than any pitch.

Ask what a return multiple was measured against

Return figures are rare here, and when they do appear they usually arrive without a denominator. YKONE publishes multiples on MINI, MSC Cruises, reMarkable and Swarovski and does not say what any of them were measured against. NeoReach publishes a 6:1 on TikTok's market entry and states that it was measured against influencer media value rather than revenue.

That gap is the question. Do not ask whether an agency has a return figure. Ask what sat underneath it: revenue, gross margin, media spend, total programme cost, or a media value the agency worked out itself. The last one is common in this category and it is not money.

Ask for the case that matches your category

Every agency here is deeper in some categories than others. Buttermilk is beauty and fashion. YKONE is luxury and travel. Socially Powerful is short-form video in beauty and gaming. Viral Nation is gaming and creator commerce. Open Influence is automotive, entertainment and travel.

A campaign that worked for a fragrance launch does not automatically work for a subscription product sold on a free trial. Ask for the closest published match to your category and your price point, then treat the absence of one as information rather than as a disqualifier on its own.

Ask who is actually on your account

Score and scale describe the firm, not your team. On a large network the people who win the pitch are rarely the people who run the work, and a mid-market budget sits near the bottom of their client list. At a small agency the founder may genuinely be on your account, and may also be on ten others.

Ask for names, hours and the escalation path. Then ask what happens to your programme in the week their biggest client has a crisis.

Deal-breakers

Walk away from an agency that will not separate paid delivery from organic. Walk away from one that quotes earned media value as though it were revenue, or presents a hashtag total as campaign delivery. Walk away from anyone who cannot name a campaign in your category and say what it returned, or who will not put creator fees and agency fees on separate lines. On a first engagement, that last one is the difference between a budget and a black box.

Frequently asked questions

Connect with us

There is no list price, and none of the agencies on this page publishes one. Cost is set by the creators you book, whose fees scale with audience size, exclusivity and how long the content stays live, and then by what the agency charges on top. Ask every shortlist for the same three lines: creator fees, the agency fee as a share of them, and what gets billed separately for paid amplification, usage rights and production. A quote that arrives as a single number hides which of the three is growing.

Four things, in order. It finds and vets creators against your audience rather than your taste. It negotiates fees and usage rights. It briefs and manages the content through approvals and disclosure. Then it reports, which is where agencies differ most. Some hand back reach and engagement. Some hand back clicks, signups or sales. Decide which of those you need before you brief anyone, because it changes the shortlist more than the creative does.

Put them side by side and make the numbers comparable first. Ask each agency what its headline metric counts: reach and impressions are not the same thing, potential reach is not delivery, and earned media value is a figure the agency calculated rather than money that changed hands. Then ask for one campaign, one channel, one window, and the result for that. An agency with working reporting sends it back inside a week. An agency that sends a deck instead has told you something.

It depends on what you measure, and the honest answer is that most published work in this category reports audience rather than revenue. Reach, impressions and engagement are what an agency will commit to. A sale, a signup or a return multiple is what you should ask it to try to measure. Set that measurement up before the campaign runs. Retrofitting attribution afterwards is where most first programmes fall apart.

The network agencies on this page score highest because the model rewards awards, scale and a long client list, and they have all three. What they sell is the idea and the ability to run it everywhere at once. The specialists publish more numbers, cost less, and are usually deeper in a single category. If you launch in one market and your board asks about cost per acquisition, a specialist is the better fit. If you are launching in a dozen and the creative is the risk, it is the other way round.

Long enough to learn something. A single burst tells you whether the creators were right and almost nothing else. Three months of continuous activity gives you enough content and enough data to see which creator type, format and hook work for your product, and that is the output worth paying for. Agree an exit point in the contract anyway.

No. It means less of what the model reads is on the public record. An agency with no awards scores nothing on industry recognition even when its campaigns work, and an agency that keeps client results confidential scores lower on client impact than one that publishes freely. Read a score as a measure of what you can verify before you sign, not as a verdict on the work.

Because it publishes the page. NeoReach is featured rather than ranked, and it carries no score in the list for that reason. Every figure quoted about its work comes from its own published case studies, on the same terms as everyone else’s. The ranking below it is ordered by the model, and the agency in first place is not NeoReach.

The go-to brief for ambitious marketers.

Creator-economy insights, benchmarks, and original reports. Straight to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

You're in.

Watch your inbox — the next brief is on its way.

Ranking methodology explained

Every agency on a NeoReach ranking is scored out of 100. On this list that is four dimensions worth 25 each: three read off public records, one judged against a written rubric. A low score means the public record behind an agency is thin, which is not the same as saying its campaigns are weak. Plenty of good agencies publish very little.

Every agency here is scored out of 100, four dimensions worth 25 each, and no dimension outweighs another.

Client impact, industry recognition, and revenue and growth are read off public records: the brands an agency has published work for, how many of its cases carry a quantitative result, the categories that work spans, its awards and press, and its team size, tenure and office footprint. Creative quality is the one judgement in the model, made against a written rubric applied to every agency in the same order.

Where two agencies finish level, the higher client impact score goes first, because that dimension is built out of published evidence.

The campaign facts in each entry come from the agency's own case studies, read on 10 August 2026. Where a figure is potential reach, a paid-media impression count or a media value the agency worked out for itself, the entry names it as that.

NeoReach publishes this page. It is featured at the top rather than ranked on it, and carries no score here for that reason.

Why these 4 for this list

A shortlister with no agency history is asking four things, and only one of them is whether the work looks good. Creative quality is whether anyone would stop scrolling. Client impact is whether a result was measured and published at all, and it is the dimension that separates this list most. Industry recognition is the only outside opinion in the model, and it is where the network agencies pull away. Revenue and growth is whether an agency can staff your campaign in every market you sell in. Discount it first if you sell in one.

Creative Quality /25
Campaign originality, content innovation and creative execution, read off published case studies, the awards a body of work has taken and the campaign formats an agency actually runs
Client Impact /25
Measurable results delivered to clients: return, engagement, reach, revenue. Counted from the named brands an agency has published work for, how many of its cases carry a quantitative result, and how many client categories that work spans
Industry Recognition /25
Validation from outside the agency: awards weighted by tier, platform partnerships, tier-one press and conference presence
Revenue & Growth /25
Business scale and trajectory: team size band, years in market and office footprint

What is not counted

Anything an agency will only say in a pitch. Unpublished results, client logos with no campaign behind them, and awards entered but not won. Where an agency has nothing a dimension can count, it lands on that dimension's floor, and its entry says so.

The rubric is fixed, not set against whichever agency happens to lead. The same record earns the same points for every agency on the page, NeoReach included.