Report

Super Bowl Ads vs. Influencer Marketing:A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Super Bowl Ads vs. Influencer Marketing: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis cover
NeoReach Research

The Super Bowl is the most expensive thirty seconds in advertising, and the money buys exactly one shot. In 2024 a single spot cost $7 million, roughly $233,333 a second, before a production budget that can add $1 to $5 million more. Once it airs there are no edits, no retargeting, no way to course-correct. The question this report asks is simple: was the money spent wisely?

To answer it, we ran the average 2024 Super Bowl ad head-to-head against a single $1 million influencer campaign we built with our client USIMS, comparing the two on cost, reach, engagement, and ROI. One side is the biggest broadcast moment on the calendar. The other is a social-first program that can be tested, tuned, and scaled in real time.

Inside, the report traces a decade of climbing ad costs, breaks down cost-per-thousand across both channels, and measures reach beyond the initial airing. It then turns to engagement and ROI, and closes with the flexibility case and how brands like CeraVe, with its Michael Cera campaign, make the Super Bowl slot work harder.

Key Highlights
  • Super Bowl ad time hit $7M for 30 seconds in 2024 (about $233,333 a second) and reached $8M in 2025.

  • Influencer marketing runs a roughly $20 CPM, $50 cheaper per thousand than the Super Bowl's $71.

  • A $1M influencer campaign drove 18M impressions; the same $7M Super Bowl budget projects to 126M+ impressions.

  • The USIMS campaign posted a 5.1% engagement rate, 5x the 1% industry average.

  • Addison Rae's Super Bowl activation cost about $500K; brands could have booked her 16 times for the price of one slot.